Doctors warned of asylum patients with HIV AIDS to the use of cheaper drugs, but less effective in medical terms.
The doctors said in the Journal on Medical Affairs in the United States that medical drugs is proprietary and will soon put on the market will provide the expenses for the U.S. health care system at about one billion dollars annually.
Related links
Ban Ki-moon: ten-year deadline for the elimination of AIDS
Related Topics
Science and Technology
The empirical data suggest that these drugs is proprietary did not prove the effectiveness of a large medical, and that patients taking three tablets instead of one disc leads to increased risks to their health.
The doctors estimated that the decline in drug efficacy may lead to a decline in the patient's age at about 4.4 months.
Noteworthy that the only treatment recommended by doctors for patients newborn infection is one tablet of the drug (Athripla), which dealt with patients daily and is a combination of three popular drugs.
The patient can be balanced in the use of effective drugs known and inexpensive.
Rochelle said and Alinska, senior researcher, "This is a difficult balance that recommended by a lot of us, but perhaps morally impossible."
She added that this balance may be more palatable if Fiscal prudence redirect to other types of HIV drugs.
The researchers estimated that out of every 15 patients who switched to a system is proprietary medicines can treat a patient with hepatitis virus (HCV) and may be completely cured of the infection.
Jason said Wariner, with Terence Hegni secretariat, a British charities involved in combating HIV, "We welcome this research is time-limited."
"There are about 7000 thousand people contract the disease each year in Britain, which means that the cost of drugs to combat HIV AIDS in increasing year after year. Given the fiscal pressures facing the health insurance sector in an unprecedented manner, the epidemic represents a challenge for public health and public spending budget. "
"The launch is proprietary drugs may be the only way to reduce health service spending, but should not be at the expense of patients' health."
|
